<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 47 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36261</link>
    <description>The court held that the terms of the grant dated 23rd October, 1867, precluded the commutation of the right to annuity of Rs. 50,000 into a lump sum grant. The court emphasized that unless the annuitant had an explicit right to demand commutation, it should be considered precluded. The decision was in favor of the assessee, directing the revenue to bear the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 13:09:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 47 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36261</link>
      <description>The court held that the terms of the grant dated 23rd October, 1867, precluded the commutation of the right to annuity of Rs. 50,000 into a lump sum grant. The court emphasized that unless the annuitant had an explicit right to demand commutation, it should be considered precluded. The decision was in favor of the assessee, directing the revenue to bear the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>