https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451315 HC allowed writ petition challenging tax penalty under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act. Court found no intentional tax evasion when goods were unloaded at a location slightly different from e-way bill registration. Penalty order was quashed, and any deposited amounts were directed to be returned within six weeks, emphasizing that technical errors without fraudulent intent should not attract punitive measures. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451315 HC allowed writ petition challenging tax penalty under Section 129(3) of UP GST Act. Court found no intentional tax evasion when goods were unloaded at a location slightly different from e-way bill registration. Penalty order was quashed, and any deposited amounts were directed to be returned within six weeks, emphasizing that technical errors without fraudulent intent should not attract punitive measures. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451315