<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1089 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451308</link>
    <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation under Section 107. The court found both the original and appellate orders lacking proper reasoning and application of mind, violating constitutional principles. The petitioner was directed to file a reply within three weeks, and the adjudicating authority was instructed to conduct a fresh hearing and issue a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1089 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451308</link>
      <description>HC allowed the writ petition challenging tax registration cancellation under Section 107. The court found both the original and appellate orders lacking proper reasoning and application of mind, violating constitutional principles. The petitioner was directed to file a reply within three weeks, and the adjudicating authority was instructed to conduct a fresh hearing and issue a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451308</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>