<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1086 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451305</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging DGGI summons under Section 70 of CGST Act. The court ruled that issuing summons does not constitute initiating proceedings under Section 6(2)(b), thereby allowing tax authorities to conduct inquiries despite prior state-level actions. The judgment affirmed the Union&#039;s authority to investigate potential tax evasion through summons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748052" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1086 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451305</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the writ petition challenging DGGI summons under Section 70 of CGST Act. The court ruled that issuing summons does not constitute initiating proceedings under Section 6(2)(b), thereby allowing tax authorities to conduct inquiries despite prior state-level actions. The judgment affirmed the Union&#039;s authority to investigate potential tax evasion through summons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>