<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1074 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451293</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the NFAC order, which was challenged for restricting the disallowance to 12.5% of purchases instead of the entire Rs. 14,90,401/-. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, agreeing that the entire addition was unjustified and that a 12.5% GP rate was reasonable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:25:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748029" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1074 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451293</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the NFAC order, which was challenged for restricting the disallowance to 12.5% of purchases instead of the entire Rs. 14,90,401/-. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, agreeing that the entire addition was unjustified and that a 12.5% GP rate was reasonable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>