<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rejects Income Addition Due to Lack of Evidence for Estimated Property Acquisition Cost.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76024</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 69 - addition based on the estimation of the cost of acquisition of the property - The ITAT observed that the AO had relied heavily on statements obtained during the survey proceedings, particularly regarding the payment of on-money for the property purchase. However, the Tribunal emphasized that such statements, which were later retracted, could not constitute valid evidence for making additions to the appellant&#039;s income. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that the AO had not provided any supporting material apart from these statements to justify the addition. Considering these factors, the Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s decision to estimate the property acquisition cost at a higher value lacked sufficient basis and was not supported by credible evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:25:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:25:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748025" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rejects Income Addition Due to Lack of Evidence for Estimated Property Acquisition Cost.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76024</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 69 - addition based on the estimation of the cost of acquisition of the property - The ITAT observed that the AO had relied heavily on statements obtained during the survey proceedings, particularly regarding the payment of on-money for the property purchase. However, the Tribunal emphasized that such statements, which were later retracted, could not constitute valid evidence for making additions to the appellant&#039;s income. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted that the AO had not provided any supporting material apart from these statements to justify the addition. Considering these factors, the Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s decision to estimate the property acquisition cost at a higher value lacked sufficient basis and was not supported by credible evidence.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:25:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>