https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451288 Receipts for online access to journals and books were held not to constitute royalty because the payment was for limited access to a database product, not for any transfer of copyright or right to exploit copyrighted material. The user received no authority to reproduce, adapt, translate, or otherwise use the underlying copyright, so the amounts fell outside section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. The more beneficial treaty position prevailed, following earlier authority distinguishing a copyrighted article from copyright itself. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:25:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451288 Receipts for online access to journals and books were held not to constitute royalty because the payment was for limited access to a database product, not for any transfer of copyright or right to exploit copyrighted material. The user received no authority to reproduce, adapt, translate, or otherwise use the underlying copyright, so the amounts fell outside section 9(1)(vi) and Article 12 of the India-US DTAA. The more beneficial treaty position prevailed, following earlier authority distinguishing a copyrighted article from copyright itself. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451288