https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451261 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Adjudicating Authority, granting the appellant an opportunity to submit additional evidence to demonstrate that the duty incidence was not transferred to the service receiver. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, enabling the appellant to substantiate their refund claim under the unjust enrichment clause. en-us Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:24:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451261 The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Adjudicating Authority, granting the appellant an opportunity to submit additional evidence to demonstrate that the duty incidence was not transferred to the service receiver. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, enabling the appellant to substantiate their refund claim under the unjust enrichment clause. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451261