<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1038 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451257</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal in part regarding CENVAT credit claims for various input services. The appellant was granted credit for construction services as they related to factory setup during the relevant period before exclusion from input service definition. For rent-a-cab services, 80% credit was allowed after employee cost recovery verification. Outdoor catering service credit was remanded for verification of 30% employee recovery claimed. Credit for courier, mandap keeper, event management, and cargo handling services distributed through ISD was allowed following ITC Limited precedent. CF and cargo handling service credit was permitted as services fell within input service definition for FOR supplies. The extended limitation period invocation was rejected due to regular departmental audits and awareness of credit availment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:23:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1038 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451257</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chandigarh allowed the appeal in part regarding CENVAT credit claims for various input services. The appellant was granted credit for construction services as they related to factory setup during the relevant period before exclusion from input service definition. For rent-a-cab services, 80% credit was allowed after employee cost recovery verification. Outdoor catering service credit was remanded for verification of 30% employee recovery claimed. Credit for courier, mandap keeper, event management, and cargo handling services distributed through ISD was allowed following ITC Limited precedent. CF and cargo handling service credit was permitted as services fell within input service definition for FOR supplies. The extended limitation period invocation was rejected due to regular departmental audits and awareness of credit availment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451257</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>