<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1032 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451251</link>
    <description>Tax appeals arising under sales tax, VAT, central sales tax and entry tax laws became infructuous after the company&#039;s dues were stated to have been settled in proceedings before the BIFR. The record showed that the State commercial tax department had been informed of the settlement position and was exempted from further hearing. In that circumstance, the SC found that no live controversy remained for adjudication and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 08:23:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1032 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451251</link>
      <description>Tax appeals arising under sales tax, VAT, central sales tax and entry tax laws became infructuous after the company&#039;s dues were stated to have been settled in proceedings before the BIFR. The record showed that the State commercial tax department had been informed of the settlement position and was exempted from further hearing. In that circumstance, the SC found that no live controversy remained for adjudication and disposed of the appeals accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>