<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (12) TMI 1498 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313084</link>
    <description>Section 40(a)(iib) applies only to specified fees or charges appropriated by a State Government from a State undertaking and does not extend to taxes. The Tribunal treated VAT paid on liquor sales under the Chhattisgarh Value Added Sales Tax Act, 2003 as a tax, not a licence fee or privilege fee, and held that it fell outside the statutory embargo. On that basis, the revisional direction requiring disallowance of the VAT claim could not be sustained and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 19:14:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (12) TMI 1498 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313084</link>
      <description>Section 40(a)(iib) applies only to specified fees or charges appropriated by a State Government from a State undertaking and does not extend to taxes. The Tribunal treated VAT paid on liquor sales under the Chhattisgarh Value Added Sales Tax Act, 2003 as a tax, not a licence fee or privilege fee, and held that it fell outside the statutory embargo. On that basis, the revisional direction requiring disallowance of the VAT claim could not be sustained and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313084</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>