<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36247</link>
    <description>The court held that technical know-how in physical form like blueprints, instructions, etc., constitutes &#039;plant&#039; for depreciation purposes under section 32. The decision was based on the necessity of technical knowledge for business operations and aligned with previous High Court rulings. The assessee was entitled to depreciation and development rebate on the technical know-how, following the Gujarat High Court precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:25:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74793" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36247</link>
      <description>The court held that technical know-how in physical form like blueprints, instructions, etc., constitutes &#039;plant&#039; for depreciation purposes under section 32. The decision was based on the necessity of technical knowledge for business operations and aligned with previous High Court rulings. The assessee was entitled to depreciation and development rebate on the technical know-how, following the Gujarat High Court precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>