<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (4) TMI 321 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313075</link>
    <description>A final police report filed before investigation was completed for all offences arising from the same transaction was treated as incomplete for the purpose of Section 167(2) CrPC, because &quot;case&quot; was read as the whole transaction and a charge-sheet must follow completion of investigation in relation to the entire case. On the facts, the first report was filed while investigation into one offence remained pending, so it did not stop the accused from claiming default bail. As investigation was completed only after expiry of the 90-day statutory period, the accused became entitled to release on bail under Section 167(2), and the earlier refusal of bail was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:18:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (4) TMI 321 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313075</link>
      <description>A final police report filed before investigation was completed for all offences arising from the same transaction was treated as incomplete for the purpose of Section 167(2) CrPC, because &quot;case&quot; was read as the whole transaction and a charge-sheet must follow completion of investigation in relation to the entire case. On the facts, the first report was filed while investigation into one offence remained pending, so it did not stop the accused from claiming default bail. As investigation was completed only after expiry of the 90-day statutory period, the accused became entitled to release on bail under Section 167(2), and the earlier refusal of bail was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>