<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1030 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451249</link>
    <description>HC found petitioner&#039;s GST return error was inadvertent. Court quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing, issue fresh order within two months, and reconsider the matter. Amounts previously appropriated will depend on remanded proceedings&#039; outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 12:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1030 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451249</link>
      <description>HC found petitioner&#039;s GST return error was inadvertent. Court quashed the impugned order and directed respondent to provide reasonable opportunity for hearing, issue fresh order within two months, and reconsider the matter. Amounts previously appropriated will depend on remanded proceedings&#039; outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>