https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451244 Bombay HC quashed the rejection order for GST registration amendment application due to violation of natural justice principles as no hearing opportunity was granted to the petitioner before rejection. The court held that Section 28(2) mandates hearing before rejecting amendment applications and orders must contain reasons. The rejection order lacked reasoning, rendering it arbitrary and illegal. The court directed authorities to decide the amendment application within two weeks. Registration suspension and ITC blocking based on the same address issue were stayed pending fresh decision on the amendment application. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451244 Bombay HC quashed the rejection order for GST registration amendment application due to violation of natural justice principles as no hearing opportunity was granted to the petitioner before rejection. The court held that Section 28(2) mandates hearing before rejecting amendment applications and orders must contain reasons. The rejection order lacked reasoning, rendering it arbitrary and illegal. The court directed authorities to decide the amendment application within two weeks. Registration suspension and ITC blocking based on the same address issue were stayed pending fresh decision on the amendment application. Case-Laws GST Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451244