<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1024 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451243</link>
    <description>The writ challenge to show cause notice and assessment orders levying GST on royalty under a mining lease was not interfered with because the issue was already covered by earlier Division Bench orders in connected matters. The petitioner did not press for a different view and accepted that the same legal position applied. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed and the GST levy on royalty was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 17:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1024 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451243</link>
      <description>The writ challenge to show cause notice and assessment orders levying GST on royalty under a mining lease was not interfered with because the issue was already covered by earlier Division Bench orders in connected matters. The petitioner did not press for a different view and accepted that the same legal position applied. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed and the GST levy on royalty was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451243</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>