<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1020 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451239</link>
    <description>Depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) was claimed on goodwill treated as an intangible asset arising from acquisition of a business, and the Revenue objected that the assessee had not disclosed the particulars of the acquired intangibles. The Supreme Court noted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order itself recorded that goodwill had been calculated and allotted to intangibles, and therefore did not find reason to disturb the High Court&#039;s view. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747887" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1020 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451239</link>
      <description>Depreciation under section 32(1)(ii) was claimed on goodwill treated as an intangible asset arising from acquisition of a business, and the Revenue objected that the assessee had not disclosed the particulars of the acquired intangibles. The Supreme Court noted that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order itself recorded that goodwill had been calculated and allotted to intangibles, and therefore did not find reason to disturb the High Court&#039;s view. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>