<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 1009 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451228</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that lease rental expenses incurred for completing property transfer under a slump sale scheme are deductible while computing capital gains under section 48(1). The tribunal ruled that when expenses are incurred to effectuate transfer as per NCLT-approved scheme arrangements, they must be allowed as transfer expenditure. Additionally, stamp duty and registration charges were held deductible for computing gains from port business demerger, despite CIT(A)&#039;s denial on technical grounds. The tribunal emphasized that crystallized expenses related to transfer cannot be denied on hyper-technical reasons when facts are undisputed. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and assessee&#039;s cross-objection allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 1009 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451228</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai held that lease rental expenses incurred for completing property transfer under a slump sale scheme are deductible while computing capital gains under section 48(1). The tribunal ruled that when expenses are incurred to effectuate transfer as per NCLT-approved scheme arrangements, they must be allowed as transfer expenditure. Additionally, stamp duty and registration charges were held deductible for computing gains from port business demerger, despite CIT(A)&#039;s denial on technical grounds. The tribunal emphasized that crystallized expenses related to transfer cannot be denied on hyper-technical reasons when facts are undisputed. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed and assessee&#039;s cross-objection allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>