https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451213 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for Countervailing Duty (CVD), interest, and penalties due to the limitation period. The Tribunal found the appellant liable as an importer but determined there was no positive act to evade duty, negating the extended period for demand. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was nullified on the basis of limitation, rendering the demand unsustainable. en-us Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Mar 2024 07:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451213 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for Countervailing Duty (CVD), interest, and penalties due to the limitation period. The Tribunal found the appellant liable as an importer but determined there was no positive act to evade duty, negating the extended period for demand. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was nullified on the basis of limitation, rendering the demand unsustainable. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451213