<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 976 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451195</link>
    <description>A beneficial area-based exemption notification must be construed according to its text and purpose, and additional plant and machinery installed after the cut-off date could not be used to read in a new disqualifying condition where commercial production had begun in time. Board circulars clarifying that later modification of machinery does not by itself defeat exemption were binding on field formations and prevailed over internal TRU communications. On the facts, the second splitting column was found to have been installed to improve product quality, not increase capacity, so exemption on goods manufactured using it remained available and the adverse demand and penalties failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747830" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 976 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451195</link>
      <description>A beneficial area-based exemption notification must be construed according to its text and purpose, and additional plant and machinery installed after the cut-off date could not be used to read in a new disqualifying condition where commercial production had begun in time. Board circulars clarifying that later modification of machinery does not by itself defeat exemption were binding on field formations and prevailed over internal TRU communications. On the facts, the second splitting column was found to have been installed to improve product quality, not increase capacity, so exemption on goods manufactured using it remained available and the adverse demand and penalties failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>