<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 973 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451192</link>
    <description>Goods imported from outside Uttar Pradesh for execution of a pre-existing works contract qualified for deduction under Rule 9(1)(e) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules, 2008. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the goods were brought into the State for a single project, and that there was no contrary finding of prior sourcing, non-application to the contract, or multiple sales, attracted the statutory benefit. On those facts, the deduction was available and the legal question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 08:35:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 973 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451192</link>
      <description>Goods imported from outside Uttar Pradesh for execution of a pre-existing works contract qualified for deduction under Rule 9(1)(e) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Rules, 2008. The Tribunal&#039;s finding that the goods were brought into the State for a single project, and that there was no contrary finding of prior sourcing, non-application to the contract, or multiple sales, attracted the statutory benefit. On those facts, the deduction was available and the legal question was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>