<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2340 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313064</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the telescoping of unaccounted income against a negative cash balance for AY 2009-10. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law, as the negative balance was justified by disclosed unaccounted income during the search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2340 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313064</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order allowing the telescoping of unaccounted income against a negative cash balance for AY 2009-10. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, finding no substantial question of law, as the negative balance was justified by disclosed unaccounted income during the search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>