<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1831 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313057</link>
    <description>ITAT Chennai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged the revision where PCIT found the Assessing Officer failed to examine seized documents while completing assessment under section 153A read with section 143(3). PCIT independently verified assessment records and discovered omitted information from seized materials during search under section 132. The Tribunal distinguished the case from precedent cited by assessee, noting PCIT&#039;s independent verification of negligence in ignoring material seized documents. The revision directing fresh assessment was deemed valid, and assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 19:22:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1831 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313057</link>
      <description>ITAT Chennai upheld PCIT&#039;s revision order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee challenged the revision where PCIT found the Assessing Officer failed to examine seized documents while completing assessment under section 153A read with section 143(3). PCIT independently verified assessment records and discovered omitted information from seized materials during search under section 132. The Tribunal distinguished the case from precedent cited by assessee, noting PCIT&#039;s independent verification of negligence in ignoring material seized documents. The revision directing fresh assessment was deemed valid, and assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>