<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 77 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36234</link>
    <description>For registration of a firm under the Income-tax Act, the partnership must be evidenced by an instrument specifying the partners&#039; individual shares, but that instrument need not be confined to a single formal deed. Contemporaneous correspondence or multiple documents may together constitute the partnership instrument if they clearly record the terms of the continuing partnership. Here, the letter dated 2 December 1969 recorded the reduced number of partners and their revised profit-sharing ratios, so it could properly be treated as part of the fresh instrument of partnership. A separate formal deed was not necessary where the written record already satisfied the statutory requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 12:00:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 77 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36234</link>
      <description>For registration of a firm under the Income-tax Act, the partnership must be evidenced by an instrument specifying the partners&#039; individual shares, but that instrument need not be confined to a single formal deed. Contemporaneous correspondence or multiple documents may together constitute the partnership instrument if they clearly record the terms of the continuing partnership. Here, the letter dated 2 December 1969 recorded the reduced number of partners and their revised profit-sharing ratios, so it could properly be treated as part of the fresh instrument of partnership. A separate formal deed was not necessary where the written record already satisfied the statutory requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>