<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (10) TMI 36 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36233</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving concealment of income under the Income Tax Act. The court determined that the concealed income amounted to Rs. 50,000, not Rs. 2.50 lakhs as contended by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Consequently, the penalty imposed was reduced to Rs. 50,000 from the initial amount. The court directed the revenue to bear the costs, including an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 150.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:59:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (10) TMI 36 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36233</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving concealment of income under the Income Tax Act. The court determined that the concealed income amounted to Rs. 50,000, not Rs. 2.50 lakhs as contended by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. Consequently, the penalty imposed was reduced to Rs. 50,000 from the initial amount. The court directed the revenue to bear the costs, including an advocate&#039;s fee of Rs. 150.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>