<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Orders Reconsideration of ITC Fraud Case Due to Assessing Officer&#039;s Failure to Review Key Evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75942</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment order - fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High court noted that documents provided by the petitioner were disregarded, and the assessing officer relied solely on the statements from the show cause notice, indicating a lack of application of mind. - It was observed that the petitioner had submitted documents such as invoices, transporter&#039;s invoice, and bank statements, which were not considered in the assessment order. - The court emphasized that the assessing officer failed to apply discretion and disregarded crucial evidence submitted by the petitioner. - Matter restored back.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Orders Reconsideration of ITC Fraud Case Due to Assessing Officer&#039;s Failure to Review Key Evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75942</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment order - fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The High court noted that documents provided by the petitioner were disregarded, and the assessing officer relied solely on the statements from the show cause notice, indicating a lack of application of mind. - It was observed that the petitioner had submitted documents such as invoices, transporter&#039;s invoice, and bank statements, which were not considered in the assessment order. - The court emphasized that the assessing officer failed to apply discretion and disregarded crucial evidence submitted by the petitioner. - Matter restored back.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>