<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451185</link>
    <description>HC quashed the assessment order challenging tax liability for GST input credit. The court found the assessing officer disregarded submitted documents and failed to apply proper judicial mind. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment, directing the officer to provide reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and allow submission of additional supporting documents within two months, without imposing costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 966 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451185</link>
      <description>HC quashed the assessment order challenging tax liability for GST input credit. The court found the assessing officer disregarded submitted documents and failed to apply proper judicial mind. The matter was remanded for fresh assessment, directing the officer to provide reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and allow submission of additional supporting documents within two months, without imposing costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>