<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessment Order Revision Valid if Inquiry Lapses on Shell Company Loans, Protecting Revenue Interests.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75939</link>
    <description>Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO&#039;s assessment did not adequately address the genuineness and creditworthiness of the loan transactions from certain entities, identified in a DDIT investigation report as shell companies operated by an entry operator. This oversight was deemed a significant inquiry lapse, rendering the assessment order both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. - The Court underscored the principle that an order could be deemed erroneous if it was prejudicial to the Revenue, even if it did not result in immediate tax loss, reflecting a broader interpretation aimed at preserving the Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:51:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment Order Revision Valid if Inquiry Lapses on Shell Company Loans, Protecting Revenue Interests.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75939</link>
      <description>Validity of Revision u/s 263 - An order which is prejudicial to revenue even if no Tax Loss - The High Court found that the AO&#039;s assessment did not adequately address the genuineness and creditworthiness of the loan transactions from certain entities, identified in a DDIT investigation report as shell companies operated by an entry operator. This oversight was deemed a significant inquiry lapse, rendering the assessment order both erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. - The Court underscored the principle that an order could be deemed erroneous if it was prejudicial to the Revenue, even if it did not result in immediate tax loss, reflecting a broader interpretation aimed at preserving the Revenue&#039;s interests.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>