<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 956 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451175</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC quashed the reassessment proceedings u/s 147 initiated by the revenue department. The court held that reopening the assessment based on cash deposits in the petitioner trust&#039;s bank account constituted a mere change of opinion rather than valid &quot;reasons to believe&quot; for income escapement. The cash deposits had already been scrutinized during the original assessment, with specific queries raised and responses provided. The petitioner, being a registered charitable trust u/s 12A eligible for exemption u/s 11, had properly disclosed all cash donations received and deposited them in bank accounts, declaring nil total income. The court found no rational connection between the investigation officer&#039;s information and any belief of income escapement, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 956 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451175</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC quashed the reassessment proceedings u/s 147 initiated by the revenue department. The court held that reopening the assessment based on cash deposits in the petitioner trust&#039;s bank account constituted a mere change of opinion rather than valid &quot;reasons to believe&quot; for income escapement. The cash deposits had already been scrutinized during the original assessment, with specific queries raised and responses provided. The petitioner, being a registered charitable trust u/s 12A eligible for exemption u/s 11, had properly disclosed all cash donations received and deposited them in bank accounts, declaring nil total income. The court found no rational connection between the investigation officer&#039;s information and any belief of income escapement, ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>