<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451171</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on multiple tax issues. The court upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing deduction under section 80-IA(8) for electricity valuation based on State Electricity Board rates as market value. Regarding transfer pricing, the court rejected disallowance of managerial remuneration to a related party, noting the company was profitable, complied with Companies Act provisions, and had board approval. The court also upheld proper allocation of common expenses between eligible and non-eligible units under section 80-IA, finding no flaws in the assessee&#039;s methodology. Additionally, the court directed compliance with DRP&#039;s order deleting bank guarantee commission addition under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451171</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal on multiple tax issues. The court upheld ITAT&#039;s decision allowing deduction under section 80-IA(8) for electricity valuation based on State Electricity Board rates as market value. Regarding transfer pricing, the court rejected disallowance of managerial remuneration to a related party, noting the company was profitable, complied with Companies Act provisions, and had board approval. The court also upheld proper allocation of common expenses between eligible and non-eligible units under section 80-IA, finding no flaws in the assessee&#039;s methodology. Additionally, the court directed compliance with DRP&#039;s order deleting bank guarantee commission addition under section 40(a)(ia).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>