<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal, Highlights Inconsistencies in ITAT Order on Rectification vs. Review Applications.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75931</link>
    <description>Validity of order of ITAT allowing Applications filed u/s 254(2) - Rectification versus Review of order - TP Adjustment - The High court observed that the ITAT had rendered incompatible and inconsistent findings in its original order. - The court noted a contradiction between paragraphs 12 and 21 of the original order. - It was deemed necessary for the ITAT to recall its previous order and correct the error to avoid leaving the TPO and Assessing Officer in a quandary. - The court found that the issue of comparability regarding one company was left open for the ITAT&#039;s consideration, while another company&#039;s matter was remitted to the TPO. - Ultimately, the court determined that the appeal of Revenue did not raise any substantial question of law and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal, Highlights Inconsistencies in ITAT Order on Rectification vs. Review Applications.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75931</link>
      <description>Validity of order of ITAT allowing Applications filed u/s 254(2) - Rectification versus Review of order - TP Adjustment - The High court observed that the ITAT had rendered incompatible and inconsistent findings in its original order. - The court noted a contradiction between paragraphs 12 and 21 of the original order. - It was deemed necessary for the ITAT to recall its previous order and correct the error to avoid leaving the TPO and Assessing Officer in a quandary. - The court found that the issue of comparability regarding one company was left open for the ITAT&#039;s consideration, while another company&#039;s matter was remitted to the TPO. - Ultimately, the court determined that the appeal of Revenue did not raise any substantial question of law and dismissed it accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:24:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>