<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 943 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451162</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled on multiple issues in this transfer pricing case. For corporate guarantee fees, the tribunal reduced the TPO&#039;s 75% interest benefit allocation to a 50:50 split between guarantor and borrower. On royalty adjustments, it set rates at nil for one AE and 0.75% for another. The tribunal deleted additions for ESI/EPF delays, audit report-based additions under section 43B, and accounting policy changes, finding no valid basis for these adjustments. It upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of notional interest on trade receivables and section 14A additions where no exempt income existed. The deduction under section 80G was remanded to AO for fresh consideration after proper evidence review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 943 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451162</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi ruled on multiple issues in this transfer pricing case. For corporate guarantee fees, the tribunal reduced the TPO&#039;s 75% interest benefit allocation to a 50:50 split between guarantor and borrower. On royalty adjustments, it set rates at nil for one AE and 0.75% for another. The tribunal deleted additions for ESI/EPF delays, audit report-based additions under section 43B, and accounting policy changes, finding no valid basis for these adjustments. It upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of notional interest on trade receivables and section 14A additions where no exempt income existed. The deduction under section 80G was remanded to AO for fresh consideration after proper evidence review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>