<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 938 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451157</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed rectification applications filed by appellants who claimed the Tribunal committed an error by not deciding the jurisdictional question. The appellants, after partially succeeding in their appeal, hired new counsel to challenge their previous counsel&#039;s submissions. CESTAT held no mistake existed on record, noting it had properly considered jurisdictional issues in the final order and decided the matter on merits after both parties chose not to press the jurisdictional question during proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:59:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 938 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451157</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed rectification applications filed by appellants who claimed the Tribunal committed an error by not deciding the jurisdictional question. The appellants, after partially succeeding in their appeal, hired new counsel to challenge their previous counsel&#039;s submissions. CESTAT held no mistake existed on record, noting it had properly considered jurisdictional issues in the final order and decided the matter on merits after both parties chose not to press the jurisdictional question during proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>