<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451140</link>
    <description>Voluntary registration and discharge of service tax after realising liability, coupled with deposit of the tax collected and failure to claim available abatement, showed bona fide conduct and absence of mens rea; penalty was therefore not warranted. The interest component, however, required proper period-wise computation, so the matter was remitted for fresh calculation by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:58:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 921 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451140</link>
      <description>Voluntary registration and discharge of service tax after realising liability, coupled with deposit of the tax collected and failure to claim available abatement, showed bona fide conduct and absence of mens rea; penalty was therefore not warranted. The interest component, however, required proper period-wise computation, so the matter was remitted for fresh calculation by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>