<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Arbitration Clause Requires Clear Intent: Court Rules General Reference Insufficient for Arbitration Agreement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75901</link>
    <description>Appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties to the present lis - interpretation of the terms of the contract between the parties - The Supreme court examined various clauses of the contract, noting that while there was a general reference to terms of another document, there was no specific mention of the arbitration clause. - It was established that mere general references to another contract were insufficient to incorporate an arbitration clause. Specific mention or intention was required for such incorporation. - The court emphasized Clause 7.0 of the contract, which explicitly stated that disputes must be resolved through civil courts in Delhi.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:58:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:58:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Arbitration Clause Requires Clear Intent: Court Rules General Reference Insufficient for Arbitration Agreement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75901</link>
      <description>Appointment of Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute between the parties to the present lis - interpretation of the terms of the contract between the parties - The Supreme court examined various clauses of the contract, noting that while there was a general reference to terms of another document, there was no specific mention of the arbitration clause. - It was established that mere general references to another contract were insufficient to incorporate an arbitration clause. Specific mention or intention was required for such incorporation. - The court emphasized Clause 7.0 of the contract, which explicitly stated that disputes must be resolved through civil courts in Delhi.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:58:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>