https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451124 Where cheque dishonour was admitted to have occurred on a stop-payment basis and insufficiency of funds was not in issue, the court held that summoning bank officials and account records under Sections 311 and 91 CrPC was unnecessary. The requested evidence would not have established any disputed fact, because the dishonour reason had already been recorded in the return memos and accepted in the complainant's evidence. Interference under Section 482 CrPC was therefore declined, and refusal to summon the bank witnesses and records was upheld. en-us Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Mar 2024 06:58:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451124 Where cheque dishonour was admitted to have occurred on a stop-payment basis and insufficiency of funds was not in issue, the court held that summoning bank officials and account records under Sections 311 and 91 CrPC was unnecessary. The requested evidence would not have established any disputed fact, because the dishonour reason had already been recorded in the return memos and accepted in the complainant's evidence. Interference under Section 482 CrPC was therefore declined, and refusal to summon the bank witnesses and records was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451124