<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313042</link>
    <description>Compulsory retirement under service rules is a non-punitive measure ordered in public interest, so judicial review is confined to mala fides, perversity, arbitrariness, or absence of material. The competent authority must consider the whole service record, with greater weight to later service, and may rely on adverse material even where some entries were not communicated. Prior promotion does not automatically wipe out adverse entries for assessing continued utility in service. Applying these principles, the officer&#039;s overall record justified the order, and the compulsory retirement was held valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 17:32:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 1297 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313042</link>
      <description>Compulsory retirement under service rules is a non-punitive measure ordered in public interest, so judicial review is confined to mala fides, perversity, arbitrariness, or absence of material. The competent authority must consider the whole service record, with greater weight to later service, and may rely on adverse material even where some entries were not communicated. Prior promotion does not automatically wipe out adverse entries for assessing continued utility in service. Applying these principles, the officer&#039;s overall record justified the order, and the compulsory retirement was held valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313042</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>