<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1458 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313036</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeals after condoning the delay. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly. The bench comprised Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy. Legal representation included the ASG and various advocates for the appellant, while the respondents were represented by an array of advocates and an AOR.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1458 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313036</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the civil appeals after condoning the delay. All pending applications were disposed of accordingly. The bench comprised Justices K.M. Joseph and Hrishikesh Roy. Legal representation included the ASG and various advocates for the appellant, while the respondents were represented by an array of advocates and an AOR.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>