<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1232 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313034</link>
    <description>A combined application for amendment of plaint and impleadment of proposed parties was treated as procedurally problematic because impleadment must be considered first, as it determines who may file pleadings and raise objections before any amendment is examined. The Court disapproved the mixed approach to distinct prayers under Order 6 Rule 17 and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, noted that separate applications avoid confusion, and indicated that trial courts may insist on independent filings and impose costs where appropriate. The impugned common order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh, separate consideration of the amendment and impleadment requests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 13:57:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1232 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313034</link>
      <description>A combined application for amendment of plaint and impleadment of proposed parties was treated as procedurally problematic because impleadment must be considered first, as it determines who may file pleadings and raise objections before any amendment is examined. The Court disapproved the mixed approach to distinct prayers under Order 6 Rule 17 and Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, noted that separate applications avoid confusion, and indicated that trial courts may insist on independent filings and impose costs where appropriate. The impugned common order was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh, separate consideration of the amendment and impleadment requests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>