<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (6) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36214</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the new house property was not constructed within the specified period after the transfer of the capital asset. Despite arguments regarding possession and transactional features, the Court emphasized that completion of construction within the timeframe was crucial. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, directing the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:03:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=74760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (6) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36214</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the exemption under section 54 of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the new house property was not constructed within the specified period after the transfer of the capital asset. Despite arguments regarding possession and transactional features, the Court emphasized that completion of construction within the timeframe was crucial. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, directing the assessee to pay the costs of the reference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=36214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>