<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451118</link>
    <description>HC quashed the assessment order challenging Input Tax Credit (ITC) discrepancies, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond to the show cause notice, with the assessing officer directed to issue a fresh order. The bank attachment notice was lifted, with the appropriated amount subject to reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 899 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451118</link>
      <description>HC quashed the assessment order challenging Input Tax Credit (ITC) discrepancies, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The petitioner was granted two weeks to respond to the show cause notice, with the assessing officer directed to issue a fresh order. The bank attachment notice was lifted, with the appropriated amount subject to reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>