<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451117</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST registration cancellation case, focusing on retrospective cancellation procedures. The court modified the cancellation order, shifting the effective date to align with actual business cessation. While allowing potential tax recovery measures, the HC emphasized the need for objective criteria in registration cancellations and highlighted procedural fairness in administrative actions under GST regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 898 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451117</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST registration cancellation case, focusing on retrospective cancellation procedures. The court modified the cancellation order, shifting the effective date to align with actual business cessation. While allowing potential tax recovery measures, the HC emphasized the need for objective criteria in registration cancellations and highlighted procedural fairness in administrative actions under GST regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>