<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Provisional Bank Account Attachment Due to Sufficient Evidence Under CGST Act; Petition Dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75883</link>
    <description>Validity of provisional attachment of the Petitioner’s bank account - Despite the petitioner&#039;s contentions, the High court determined that substantial material existed for the Commissioner to form an opinion in favor of the attachment. The court emphasized that the petitioner failed to confront the department with sufficient evidence against the action under Section 83 of the CGST Act. Furthermore, the court noted the issuance of a Show Cause Notice with abundant material supporting a tax demand against the petitioner. Considering these factors, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the provisional attachment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Provisional Bank Account Attachment Due to Sufficient Evidence Under CGST Act; Petition Dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75883</link>
      <description>Validity of provisional attachment of the Petitioner’s bank account - Despite the petitioner&#039;s contentions, the High court determined that substantial material existed for the Commissioner to form an opinion in favor of the attachment. The court emphasized that the petitioner failed to confront the department with sufficient evidence against the action under Section 83 of the CGST Act. Furthermore, the court noted the issuance of a Show Cause Notice with abundant material supporting a tax demand against the petitioner. Considering these factors, the court rejected the petitioner&#039;s challenge to the provisional attachment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>