<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 877 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451096</link>
    <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal partially. The tribunal set aside the working capital adjustment issue to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh consideration, following precedents from Parexel International cases. Regarding ECB interest benchmarking, the tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s payment of interest at LIBOR+275 basis points on a five-year ECB loan, noting that such loans can have a spread of 300 basis points and that previous orders had accepted this rate structure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 877 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451096</link>
      <description>ITAT Hyderabad allowed the appeal partially. The tribunal set aside the working capital adjustment issue to the Assessing Officer/TPO for fresh consideration, following precedents from Parexel International cases. Regarding ECB interest benchmarking, the tribunal accepted the assessee&#039;s payment of interest at LIBOR+275 basis points on a five-year ECB loan, noting that such loans can have a spread of 300 basis points and that previous orders had accepted this rate structure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>