<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Importer in Stamping Foils Valuation Dispute, Rejects Department&#039;s Use of Proforma Invoices.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75862</link>
    <description>Valuation of imported goods - stamping foils - rejection of declared value - The tribunal found that the department&#039;s reliance on proforma invoices for A-grade goods was misplaced, given the appellant&#039;s importation of B and C-grade goods. The tribunal also recognized the appellant&#039;s submission of contemporaneous import data supporting their declared values. - The tribunal concurred with the appellant that there was no evidence of extra payment to the foreign supplier beyond the invoice values. - Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s declared values were justified, and the initial inculpatory statement could not be relied upon due to the coercive circumstances under which it was obtained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:16:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:16:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules in Favor of Importer in Stamping Foils Valuation Dispute, Rejects Department&#039;s Use of Proforma Invoices.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75862</link>
      <description>Valuation of imported goods - stamping foils - rejection of declared value - The tribunal found that the department&#039;s reliance on proforma invoices for A-grade goods was misplaced, given the appellant&#039;s importation of B and C-grade goods. The tribunal also recognized the appellant&#039;s submission of contemporaneous import data supporting their declared values. - The tribunal concurred with the appellant that there was no evidence of extra payment to the foreign supplier beyond the invoice values. - Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s declared values were justified, and the initial inculpatory statement could not be relied upon due to the coercive circumstances under which it was obtained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:16:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>