<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 867 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451086</link>
    <description>Civil appeals were found to be barred by limitation because the filing delay exceeded the maximum condonable period under the applicable limitation provision. The Court treated the delay as beyond the statutory scope for condonation and, on that basis, held the appeals time-barred and dismissed them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:16:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 867 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451086</link>
      <description>Civil appeals were found to be barred by limitation because the filing delay exceeded the maximum condonable period under the applicable limitation provision. The Court treated the delay as beyond the statutory scope for condonation and, on that basis, held the appeals time-barred and dismissed them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451086</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>