<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (3) TMI 861 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451080</link>
    <description>At the discharge or charge-framing stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the court must only see whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and sufficient grounds to proceed; it cannot weigh evidence as at trial. A plea that seized articles were undervalued and below the statutory threshold involved a disputed question of fact and did not by itself show the charge was groundless. Because the allegations also concerned parking proceeds of crime in bank accounts and using those proceeds to purchase properties, the court found no abuse of process and upheld the framing of charges, rejecting the challenge to discharge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 20:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747520" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (3) TMI 861 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451080</link>
      <description>At the discharge or charge-framing stage under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the court must only see whether the prosecution material discloses a prima facie case and sufficient grounds to proceed; it cannot weigh evidence as at trial. A plea that seized articles were undervalued and below the statutory threshold involved a disputed question of fact and did not by itself show the charge was groundless. Because the allegations also concerned parking proceeds of crime in bank accounts and using those proceeds to purchase properties, the court found no abuse of process and upheld the framing of charges, rejecting the challenge to discharge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=451080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>