https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313026 The appeal concerning AY 2008-09 was disposed of by the Tribunal, with no substantial questions of law arising from the proposed questions "A" and "B," as they were covered by a prior judgment. Similarly, questions "C," "D," and "E" were deemed covered by the Karnataka HC's decision in the Wipro Ltd. case. The appellant/revenue retains the liberty to revive the appeal if successful in the pending Supreme Court matter. The parties are directed to act according to the digitally signed order. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:52:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313026 The appeal concerning AY 2008-09 was disposed of by the Tribunal, with no substantial questions of law arising from the proposed questions "A" and "B," as they were covered by a prior judgment. Similarly, questions "C," "D," and "E" were deemed covered by the Karnataka HC's decision in the Wipro Ltd. case. The appellant/revenue retains the liberty to revive the appeal if successful in the pending Supreme Court matter. The parties are directed to act according to the digitally signed order. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 23 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313026