<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313024</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, resulting in the deletion of the penalty under section 271B. The tribunal determined that since the assessee did not maintain any books of accounts, the penalty under section 271B was inappropriate. Instead, the tribunal referenced precedents indicating that when no accounts are maintained, section 271A should apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1444 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313024</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, resulting in the deletion of the penalty under section 271B. The tribunal determined that since the assessee did not maintain any books of accounts, the penalty under section 271B was inappropriate. Instead, the tribunal referenced precedents indicating that when no accounts are maintained, section 271A should apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>