<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (1) TMI 1316 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313019</link>
    <description>The petitioner requested a writ of mandamus to amend GSTR statements for certain periods. The HC determined the petition was premature, advising the petitioner to initially engage with the respondent. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 18:52:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (1) TMI 1316 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313019</link>
      <description>The petitioner requested a writ of mandamus to amend GSTR statements for certain periods. The HC determined the petition was premature, advising the petitioner to initially engage with the respondent. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=313019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>